Sunday, August 28, 2011

What is No Limits Christian Ministries, Incorporated?

One question that came up at the beginning of the process was, "What is No Limits Christian Ministries, Inc., anyway?"  Are they a counseling center, or are they a church?  Or are they something else?  As always, it's helpful to look at what is written, rather than what is said, to find the answer.

There are two listings in the Idaho Secretary of State's Business listing search which apply:
No Limits Christian Ministries, Inc., and No Limits Christ-Based Counseling Ministries, Inc., both of which are registered as 501c(3) nonprofits and show Clark D. Williams, Sr. as the registered agent.

Look at the purpose listed on the No Limits Christian Ministries, Inc. Articles of Incorporation document:
"To instruct, teach, direct, prepare, encourage and equip men and women for ministry."  Nothing about it being a "church."  More like a missionary or ministry training center.  Although the general idea of ministerial training is religious in nature, this document does not indicate anything about assembling people together for worship purposes. This document was the first of the two, filed on February 17, 2010.

This document, the No Limits Christ Based Counseling Ministries, Inc. Articles of Incorporation, was filed on April 8, 2011, well into the Conditional Use Permitting process.  Again, look at the "purpose":
 Note the purpose of this non-profit corporation: "To counsel, train and coach in areas of general life, marriage, substance abuse, and financial matters."  Now they are a "counseling center." Again, no mention of "church," or gathering groups of people for worship services.

Here is the Mountain Home City Code's definition of a "church": (emphasis added)

CHURCH/RELIGIOUS FACILITIES: A building or structure, or groups of buildings or structures, which by design and construction are primarily intended for the conducting of organized religious services and/or a household unit for persons employed in the building. Schools, clubs, day care and accessory uses associated therewith shall require a conditional use.

So, which is it?  Is the applicant trying to open a ministry training center, and then a counseling center?  Only on the application for the conditional use permit do we see the word "church."

The date of this application is December 16, 2010. Note the entry under "Existing uses": "Christian Counseling Ministry"  But the document incorporating the "No Limits Christ Based Counseling Ministries, Inc." was not filed until April 8, 2011- so that could not have been an "existing use" on December 16, 2010, unless it was operating there without being registered with the Secretary of State.

Also notable is this transaction detail log from No Limits Christ-Based Counseling Ministries, Inc.'s Chicago-based law firm, Mauck and Baker:


 So, No Limits's Pastor Clark Williams began consultation with the Chicago's Mauck and Baker back in March, 2011, according to this log.  Neither No Limits' Clark Williams, nor representatives of their Chicago law firm ever mentioned this fact to the city at any point in the process until after the suit was filed.

It looks like, from these documents, we had a "non-profit" business setup which then decided to later call itself a "church" to take advantage of the legal status of "churches" in the outrageous exemptions for churches found in both Idaho and Federal Code.

The fact remains, as pointed out in our city attorney's excellent letter, this whole thing could have been avoided had their attorney simply picked up the phone, called our attorney and notified him of the applicability of RLUIPA to this case (dubious as it may be), and we would have caved right then and there.  And probably even paid the $ 600 per hour(!) accrued fees to that point.  Instead, No Limits "Christ-Based" Counseling Ministries, Incorporated, by filing this case without any warning whatsoever got to pocket $24,000 in "damages," right out of the City treasury.  A city treasury, which, by the way, they pay into not one cent, and a city treasury out of which come the funds to maintain the streets and provide services to that very church.

Quite a racket, isn't it?

You don't know the half of it.
Next up- "Counseling."  You're not gonna believe it.

2 comments:

  1. What I'm reading here sounds like NLCM set up the City? And I was at the May 9th, 2011 City Council Meeting when this organization "presented the proverbial hook, set that hook and started reeling in the "City". I'm appalled and disgusted at what I'm seeing coming to light.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's right, Tim. Take another look at the attorney's detail transaction log. There are entries for March 8, 9, and 10 2011. Not another entry until May 10th- the day after they set the "hook, line and sinker."
    Even worse is the patently false assertion in the initial filing that we denied their conditional use permit application at that meeting. We only denied the preposterous and non-existed "temporary" conditional use permit. The falsity of that claim, however, was, in the legal world, completely overshadowed by the fact they ought not to have needed to obtain a CUP in the first place. So that got no traction. But now I can make a blog post about their making a(nother) false claim in their lawsuit.

    ReplyDelete